So, I need to clarify some things. My wish is that at least it gets indexed by some search engines and people stop accusing me of not knowing what I am talking about. About a month or so ago, I was interviewed by one of Ohio State’s student newspapers, The Lantern. The purpose of the interview was to showcase the Open Source Club, which I was completely happy to do because this was an awesome opportunity to get our name out and, being the President, one of my duties is to be the public face of the club. While most of the interview went over rather well and I was impressed with the reporters knowledge of technology, it did end up with a quote being put into print that was taken out of context and actually completely misquoted altogether. The quote in question made me look like a total idiot when it comes to the open source world. The quote goes as follows,
“Alek Rollyson, a third-year in information systems and the club’s president, said there is a difference between free software and open source software. Free software is like “free beer, or free as in it doesn’t cost me anything,” he said.”
This is the travesty I am referring to. While 98% of people reading this article have no idea where the fault lies, that 2% of people are the one’s I am concerned about. I was bashed by several blogging sites for being a poor open source representative and not knowing a thing when it comes to the open source community. I assure you, this is not the case. Here’s how the quote should have gone..
“A lot of people see a fundamental difference between free software and open source software. When you say “free”, most people immediately think of free in the monetary sense or the famous quote, “free as in beer”. When I say free software, what I actually mean is free as in liberty. I am free to share, study and modify the program however I want. Free software implies that the user is free.”
Since it has been a month or so since this story was printed and the interview took place, I cannot recall the exact words I used. But, I can assure you they were in the same context. I am not sure whether the reporter just misunderstood what I said, whether I was just unclear in the interview (which I accept is entirely possible), or the reporter just locked down on that “free as in beer” quote in order to draw some more attention. In any case, I can assure you that is not what I said or what I meant. The whole purpose of this post was to get it out and indexed by search engines so that hopefully when people come and look me up they can see the correction and know that I am not, in fact, a moron. I am holding no grudge against the reporter, in fact I think that he did a relatively good job, I just felt it important that I clear my name of what is just a misunderstanding.